Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA to Test-Fire Booster for Megarocket Tuesday: Watch Live
Space.com ^ | 06/27/2016 | Mike Wall

Posted on 06/27/2016 9:02:26 PM PDT by BenLurkin

NASA will test-fire a booster for the world's most powerful rocket Tuesday morning (June 28), and you can watch the explosive action live online.

A solid rocket booster for NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) megarocket — which the agency is developing to blast astronauts toward Mars and other deep-space destinations — will fire for 2 minutes Tuesday at a facility in Utah, beginning at 10:05 a.m. EDT (1405 GMT). You can watch it live here at Space.com, courtesy of NASA TV; coverage starts at 9:30 a.m. EDT (1330 GMT).

NASA will hold a press conference at 11 a.m. EDT (1500 GMT) Tuesday to discuss the results of the test. You can listen to audio of the press conference here at Space.com as well, courtesy of NASA.

...

Tuesday's test, like the March 2015 trial, will take place in Promontory, Utah, at a facility owned by aerospace company Orbital ATK, an SLS partner.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: atk; nasa; sls

1 posted on 06/27/2016 9:02:26 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I read that making big boosters isn’t a problem - managing the vibration resonances as it fires is the problem. They can rip the rocket to pieces.


2 posted on 06/27/2016 9:04:57 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

What is its power relative to the Saturn 5?


3 posted on 06/27/2016 9:17:43 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Another challenge is maintaining a consistent burning surface area as the SRP burns away. (An increase in burning area = an uncontrolled increase in internal pressure and thrust.)

Just about the worst defect is burning at the interface between propellant and the casing.

That's why polysulfide rubber-based propellants are literally Vulcanized to their casings -- in huge autoclaves.

It's not called, "rocket science" for no reason... '-)

4 posted on 06/27/2016 9:29:07 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias; "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Did they really mean to say.. “Watch the EXPLOSIVE action”?


5 posted on 06/27/2016 9:32:42 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas

ATK has been making these kind of boosters for a long time and has become quite good at it.


6 posted on 06/27/2016 9:34:28 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Just wait until Obama sees THIS on the news!
Oh man! He’s gonna be pissed!
NASA is supposed to be doing Muslim outreach, not this science-y, rocket-y, stuff.


7 posted on 06/27/2016 9:36:11 PM PDT by Ignatz (Winner of a prestigious 1960 Y-chromosome award!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

What is its power relative to the Saturn 5?

...

According to Wiki it looks like the two solid boosters combined would be 7.2 million pounds of thrust. The Saturn was 7.5. The SLS also has a center core which would make it altogether more powerful than the Saturn V.


8 posted on 06/27/2016 9:49:46 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz

No prob. Just strap some Musloids to it and there you go.


9 posted on 06/27/2016 10:07:53 PM PDT by beethovenfan (Islam is a cancer on civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

We still have a space program? Oh how we’ve lost our way under Obama.


10 posted on 06/27/2016 10:15:48 PM PDT by NYRepublican72 (Radical Islamic terrorist Omar Mateen is "Ready for Hillary!" Are you too?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Yabbut, the F-1 could be throttled. Amazing they had to cut one engine back as the fuel load dropped off to keep the acceleration under control. That beast wanted to go and go.

Or so I understood the need to shut off one engine.

11 posted on 06/27/2016 10:28:46 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Does this one have a made in Russia label on it, like all those going to the Space Station?


12 posted on 06/27/2016 11:09:10 PM PDT by Noob1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Solid rocket boosters & Utah...Morton-Thiokol must be “Orbital-ATK” now. Yep: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiokol


13 posted on 06/27/2016 11:21:25 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Bookmark.


14 posted on 06/28/2016 3:22:54 AM PDT by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noob1999
Does this one have a made in Russia label on it, like all those going to the Space Station?

I wish it had a made in Russia price tag.

15 posted on 06/28/2016 3:28:08 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
this is another static test of the five-section SRB's. The Shuttle variation of the solids were of four sections. This isn't any real test of the first-stage liquid-fueled Space Launch System (SLS) engines. The only new rocket engine in the SLS configuration is the J-2X, essentially now "in the can at Stennis - the newly-designed equivalent of the Saturn V third stage engine.

I don't know where they are with the Orion SM engine, now apparently called the "Orion European Service Module." though because it was the same components used in the ESA ATV program, I suppose one could claim it too was now "in the can."

Quite a design committee, though not necessarily built by the lowest bidder.

16 posted on 06/28/2016 4:30:51 AM PDT by Prospero (Omnis caro fenum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

Design work on the F1 began in the early 1950’s. It was an incredible engine for its time.

Even though the new SLS will have more thrust that the Saturn V, it won’t be able to lift as much tonnage to orbit. Of course the real purpose of SLS is to keep Boeing and its politicians rich. I think Boeing supplies better hookers than everybody else.


17 posted on 06/28/2016 6:22:19 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Drago

I hope they are using more than two O-rings.


18 posted on 06/28/2016 7:17:59 AM PDT by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson