Skip to comments.
Professor who donates sperm in city bathrooms has sired 22 kids
NYPost ^
| June 12, 2016
Posted on 06/12/2016 4:46:53 PM PDT by SMGFan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
isn't this type of activity illegal in public facilities?
1
posted on
06/12/2016 4:46:53 PM PDT
by
SMGFan
To: SMGFan
And he hasn’t been sued for child support yet?
2
posted on
06/12/2016 4:48:36 PM PDT
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: SMGFan
and of course this probably takes place in the Little Girls’ Room..... since he does it at Target
3
posted on
06/12/2016 4:48:37 PM PDT
by
faithhopecharity
("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero)
To: 2banana
He may have boasted himself into bankruptcy. If any of these kids receive public assistance, the government should seek child support from him. Matters little what the mothers promised him since it was a direct donation.
4
posted on
06/12/2016 4:52:02 PM PDT
by
allendale
To: SMGFan
Another reason to not shop at Target.
5
posted on
06/12/2016 4:53:35 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMind
("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
To: SMGFan
Well at least he isn’t ‘doing the hand jive on tv’ ....
6
posted on
06/12/2016 5:00:06 PM PDT
by
deport
To: SMGFan
Now we know where the name “Target” first come from.
7
posted on
06/12/2016 5:02:50 PM PDT
by
867V309
(It's over. It's over now.)
To: 2banana
Five times. Read the article.
8
posted on
06/12/2016 5:06:04 PM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(In point of fact.)
To: 2banana
[[And he hasnt been sued for child support yet?]]
From the article :
The first five women he worked with successfully sued him for child support, and nearly half of his paycheck is garnished for his offspring.
I dont know whats more surprising: that five sued or that 17 didnt, Nagel says. They were all well aware there was no financial obligation on my part. They all promise in advance they wont sue.
9
posted on
06/12/2016 5:08:26 PM PDT
by
Lera
( 1 Corinthians 15:1-4)
To: SMGFan
Well, you can’t expect him to do it drive-by...
10
posted on
06/12/2016 5:09:08 PM PDT
by
bigbob
To: SMGFan
It's more of the "Five Millileters of Fatherhood" philosophy. A madcap, makeshift. miniscule morality. "All I owe my kid is in this little plastic baggie right here."
So he and these women simply agree to deprive their children of basic rights that are supposed to be supplied by their natural fathers: the right to identity, a place in the paternal kinship constellation, the right to provision and protection, and the right to live in a family headed by your married, natural parents.
He's ripping his kids off for ALL of their rights with regard to his fatherhood--- the putz --- and he thinks he's a humanitarian!
Tagline
11
posted on
06/12/2016 5:18:46 PM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
("Satisfying the immediate desires of adults requires indifference to the suffering of children.")
To: SMGFan
The first five women he worked with successfully sued him for child support, and nearly half of his paycheck is garnished for his offspring. I dont know whats more surprising: that five sued or that 17 didnt, Nagel says. They were all well aware there was no financial obligation on my part. They all promise in advance they wont sue. I hope this traitor isn't expecting any sympathy from me on this.
12
posted on
06/12/2016 5:19:19 PM PDT
by
TwelveOfTwenty
(See my home page for some of my answers to the left's talking points.)
To: SMGFan
It just goes to show what you can do with good, shameless advertising.
To: SMGFan
“18 women of various backgrounds.”
Somehow I think these 18 women have very similar backgrounds.
14
posted on
06/12/2016 5:26:08 PM PDT
by
Celerity
To: Celerity
I’m wondering if he’s doing it all in the same general neighborhood...
15
posted on
06/12/2016 5:29:49 PM PDT
by
Jamestown1630
("A Republic, If you can keep it.")
To: deport
Well at least he isnt doing the hand jive on tv ....Jazz Jizz hands...
16
posted on
06/12/2016 5:30:06 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Lera
"...They all promise in advance they wont sue..." That part of the article made me literally laugh out loud!
17
posted on
06/12/2016 5:48:37 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Embrace your Curmudgeonliness.)
To: Lera
Losing half of his paycheck? What an idiot.
To: SMGFan
Reminds me of the Beltway Elementary School, Class of 2016 picture.
To: Mrs. Don-o
There are far more heterosexual women in New York than heterosexual men. He’s just performing an arbitrage service, and doing a good job of getting free advertising from the newspaper.
Nowhere does it say how much he gets paid. He probably keeps that out of the picture so it doesn’t increase his child support payments.
20
posted on
06/12/2016 8:26:26 PM PDT
by
AZLiberty
(A is no longer A, but a pull-down menu.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson