Posted on 06/09/2016 5:24:38 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement
All these seem to apply to the clubs, not individial players. If a person is in a position to get more, who'd refuse saying 'no, your money isn't truly yours'?
>All these seem to apply to the clubs, not individual players.
IOW, taxpayers aren’t truly paying for abortions @ PP; like players aren’t getting paid. /s
W/out the flush of welfare, does anyone expect the owners to be paying the big $$ to their employees? Let alone the stadiums, upgrades, upkeep, etc.?
I agree with you, the club owners would offer quite different contracts. But I don't see why the players should be blamed - they get what they've managed to negotiate. Negotiating is honest, why would one turn down a bigger offer?
Blame the government and/or councils on the welfare. Not even clubs.
They're no better than slaves. /s
All a player has to do is put their first year’s salary in the bank and let it sit. They can spend everything else, and they’ll still be just fine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.