Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SauronOfMordor

I couldn’t agree more! An SS agent should keep these things private, no matter how distasteful. And I can’t stand the Clintons.


14 posted on 06/04/2016 4:03:53 PM PDT by angelrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: angelrod
An SS agent should keep these things private, no matter how distasteful.

I wondered the same thing myself.

If the Secret Service agent took an oath to the Constitution, to defend it from enemies foreign and DOMESTIC, maybe he's just following through on his oath.

20 posted on 06/04/2016 4:10:23 PM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: angelrod

I disagree. Minor character flaws or idiosyncrasies yes. Efforts to usurp the constitution and defraud the people should be reported. A SSA should be a patriot.


49 posted on 06/04/2016 5:00:22 PM PDT by PJammers (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: angelrod

“An SS agent should keep these things private, no matter how distasteful.”

No matter how distasteful? Seriously? He is no less important than the person he protects. In a larger sense, his to is to protect America. He is a law enforcement officer. He isn’t a praetorian guard.

That’s a disgusting way to view the SS as some sort of lesser lackeys, who should suspend their own decency and judgment as a man and keep vile activities secret.


51 posted on 06/04/2016 5:01:30 PM PDT by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: angelrod

Wrong perspective ... that is OUR House and there ought not be any ‘distasteful’ things going on in there that are not made public.


62 posted on 06/04/2016 5:21:25 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: angelrod

Should he keep treason, graft, no matter what secret?

You make a broad statement not knowing what he has seen.

You might want to wait until you see what is in the book.


65 posted on 06/04/2016 5:28:20 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: angelrod

I would agree the SS should be silent. Perhaps the circumstances in the case of the Clintons are so outrageous, and actually anti-American, so the agent may be serving as a whistle blower of sorts.

Sometimes you have to speak - especially if you feel it’s your duty to warn the American people of danger.


78 posted on 06/04/2016 5:59:44 PM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: angelrod
So, when US military members knew that an Iraqi pig was raping children, they should have just stayed silent and ensured the privacy of the pedophile pig?

The SS isn't some sort of secret security service that protects the dictator or capos and soldiers who protect a mafia don.

I would rather the American people know that the same treasonous trash that claims Trump has not the dignity nor the temperament to be president is the very one who does not have the dignity or temperament needed by POTUS.

Low info voters become low info voters when secrets and truth are hidden from their eyes and ears.

165 posted on 06/05/2016 4:54:38 AM PDT by Thumper1960 (Trump-2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: angelrod

You are WRONG. Public figures with protection should behave themselves. If they are playing sex games in the oval office with women and cigars, maybe we should know about it.


168 posted on 06/05/2016 4:59:39 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson