[DannyTN]

The problem with a $265,000 car is most people don’t have enough insurance to cover it.

I think insurance companies should be limited to liability covering $50,000 per vehicle, and anything over that, is up to the owner to self-insure.

[HIDEK6]

I think insurance companies should be limited to liability covering $50,000 per vehicle, and anything over that, is up to the owner to self-insure.

Don't you think we have enough rules?

[Ouderkirk]

How perfectly socialist of you....

So my $70,000 Toyota Sequoia is only worth $50K to you and I am expected to foot the bill for your fault? I’ll see you in court for the balance of the damages, even if it means I have to take your mobile home and sell it to recover what I am owed to make me whole.

[discostu]

If you can afford a $265K car you can afford to insure it, and by the very nature of how car insurance works it IS enough to cover it.

[DesertRhino]

“I think insurance companies should be limited to liability covering $50,000 per vehicle, and anything over that, is up to the owner to self-insure.”

Why is that any of your business? If I go to state farm and want to insure my 150k Porsche, they calculate what payment makes it worth the risk to them, I pay it, and we strike a deal.
It doesn’t affect you at all. But your argument makes sense to Hillary.

[Quality_Not_Quantity]

I think insurance companies should be limited to liability covering $50,000 per vehicle, and anything over that, is up to the owner to self-insure.

Really? Why is that? Who gets to decide how much of anything is too much?

Oh, wait, I know the answer to that one - it's the government and the socialists/communists who hate it that you've been successful.

Which group are YOU a part of, DannyTN?