Every one in my office at work, republicans and democrats alike think Cruz had at least 2 affairs. Not sure but enough evidence presented to make that view the most likely
here is the evidence that leads them in that direction:
1) The press conference with Carla F. He just came across as hiding something, that is the impression he left.
2) The 500,000 hush money directed to Sarah in Carla’s campaign. That actually may rise to the level of a crime.
3) Amanda Carpenter: her tweets, the time stamps, the pictures, the black list and her actions on CNN. She looks like a women in love with a married man, that is the most logical explanation for her actions.
Cruz is damaged goods.
And everyone I've spoken to at work, regardless of political orientation, says that story is bunk.
The press conference with Carla F. He just came across as hiding something, that is the impression he left.
Among those who want to believe he's hiding something. You see such countenance because you WANT to see it.
The 500,000 hush money directed to Sarah in Carla’s campaign. That actually may rise to the level of a crime.
PAC to PAC. No matter your suspicions, it's not a campaign-to-campaign transfer. Prove (and NOT suppose or assume) otherwise.
Amanda Carpenter: her tweets, the time stamps, the pictures, the black list and her actions on CNN. She looks like a women in love with a married man, that is the most logical explanation for her actions.
You can make your own suppositions based on what you think someone is up to. Not sure what you mean by "looking like a woman in love with a married man."
The voters of Wisconsin will tell us whether "Cruz is damaged goods."
So.. to sum up.. in your mind, Cruz is guilty because 1.) You spoke to some people at work who agree with you; 2) Two PACs exchanged money; and 3) Amanda Carpenter acts odd.
That's it? No pics, videos, admissions, confessions or eyewitnesses... IOW... actual proof?