Because there is other evidence that contradicts it, both audio and video. The so-called evidence that she was not telling the truth was one angle, very selectively edited. There are other videos from other angles as well as audio. There is another journalist who witnessed it. She filed an official police report. Team Trump is slandering her and promoting a one angle perspective, ignoring all the other evidence.”
Really??? So, you refute the video presented, you ignore the admission that the Trump campaign manager was not involved. Bet you are a cruzbot. Just like the reporter...
No, he isn’t driving his statements based on emotion and reaction unlike some here. He as with others are awaiting all evidence to come in prior to being judge jury and executioner. Yours and many others knee jerk reaction and immediate acquittal of other based on a very small sliver in time is par for the course. It isn’t surprising since our culture now is built upon 15 second attention spans (I.e. Twitter trash, Facebook fanaticism, YouTube starlets.
The latest evidence is new and fresh. Quite honestly you and many others may very well be right that this is a hoax. However would you want all information to come in that reaches that conclusion or opposing evidence be presented making you and others foolish? Also, I’m not getting the Cruz monikers. Calling someone a Cruzbot or Cruzer is no different than a liberal democrat calling a tea party patriot a tea bagger. It is demeaning and quite honestly a lazy attempt to discredit someone based on association.