Weather events that run counter to the latest proposed pattern for global warming are just random events and only idiot deniers would try to cite random events to counter settled science.
[[Weather events that fit the latest proposed pattern are valid examples of the effects of global warming.]]
No doubt- but the fact is weather is warming- then it will cool again- there is NO link to man’s CO2 though, and it certainly can’t be linked to just 0.00136% of the atmosphere
To put htis in perspective- take a thimble full of 100 degree water, drop it into an olympic sized pool of 98 degree water- once a year- and then tell us the pool has ‘catastrophically warmed’ in the past decade due to thimbles of 100 degree water beign dumped in once a year-
That’s how freakin ridiculous the argument is that man is causing climate change- Our atmosphere does not have enough CO2 to do anything regarding changing the climate- nothing- there isn’t enough CO2 to do so- there is no ‘thick blanket of CO2 preventing heat from escaping the earth’- there simply is not enough of it to blanket the globe- let alone in a thick enough layer to cause warming
Oh, nice! If I were still a reader of the 'Rat- and queer-infested Houston Chronicle, I could expect to see that one in print any day now, spewed out with a straight face and a promise that some day deniers will be affirmatively punished for doing the evil work of evil Exxon and evil Shell Oil and evil ChevronTexaco.
So much evil, so few fraternal firing squads, so little time!