Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NHS to harvest babies' organs: 'Ghoulish' proposal gives mothers pregnant with a damaged.....
dailymail.uk ^ | March 8, 2016 | Beezy Marsh And Stephen Adams For The Mail On Sunday

Posted on 03/09/2016 8:48:15 AM PST by Morgana

FULL TITLE: NHS to harvest babies' organs: 'Ghoulish' proposal gives mothers pregnant with a damaged foetus an agonising choice - abort the dying child or give birth so body parts can be used for transplants

Women whose babies develop fatal defects in the early stages of pregnancy will be given advice on going ahead with the birth so the NHS can harvest their organs, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Most expectant mothers opt for termination after being told the devastating news their child has no chance of survival once born.

But now, amid a chronic shortage of donated organs, mums will be 'supported' to have the baby at nine months so that the child's vital organs can be taken for transplant.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: abortion; fetalharvesting; organdonating; prolife

1 posted on 03/09/2016 8:48:15 AM PST by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Good gwad.


2 posted on 03/09/2016 8:51:38 AM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 HillaryForPrison2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne; wagglebee

Yea I know, this won’t end well.


3 posted on 03/09/2016 9:01:59 AM PST by Morgana ( Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Highlighted quote from article:
"Ethically controversial, but increasingly practical"

Next up, breeding babies explicitly for the purpose because there aren't enough birth defects?

4 posted on 03/09/2016 9:18:35 AM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Why use organs from babies who were deemed so damaged that it was recommended they be killed?

Sounds like it’s just the abortion mill’s new way of justifying selling baby parts. The mother will check off a new box on the waiver form stating that she wants her child’s organs to be ‘donated’. It makes the mom feel like a hero and makes the selling of baby parts nice and legal.

And while they will use the term “donated”, there will be processing fees, handling fees, shipping fees and anything else they can think of to charge for...

There will probably be new procedures added-for health insurance- which will be performed by a special harvesting team- all legal.

And that means more money for this ‘noble’ cause without having to sell baby parts while having lunch with potential customers.

God help us...


5 posted on 03/09/2016 9:22:29 AM PST by homegroan (It is nice to be important, but it is more important to be nice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I think this is fake.....it is a suggestion from the transplantation society or some such organization. But the line ‘after the child is declared stillborn’ is appalling. The transplantation society would like the woman to carry a ‘defective’ child as long as possible to enhance the viability of their organs......and then the child will be left do die and declared STILLBORN?? The translantation society needs to disband and spend the rest of their lives doing good works.


6 posted on 03/09/2016 9:29:28 AM PST by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

I’m suspect of it too.
For instance they can’t use the hearts of babies of down syndrome children because the majority suffer cardiovascular problems at birth.

Now granted there are other organs to harvest but those are limited. I’m wondering what they are really up to.


7 posted on 03/09/2016 9:35:39 AM PST by Morgana ( Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Salman

“Next up, breeding babies explicitly for the purpose because there aren’t enough birth defects? “

That has been done! http://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/17/us/baby-is-conceived-to-save-daughter.html

“BABY IS CONCEIVED TO SAVE DAUGHTER”


8 posted on 03/09/2016 9:44:37 AM PST by Morgana ( Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

It’s not a bug: it’s a feature.


9 posted on 03/09/2016 10:34:50 AM PST by Tax-chick (There is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson