Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jim Gilmore: Hillary's Worst Nightmare? (Vanity)
02/05/2016 | Myself

Posted on 02/05/2016 10:04:57 PM PST by Crucial

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: nickcarraway

Yes, it was a bad year, but not 33.7% bad. McQueeg got over a dozen points more than Gilmore in VA, and he wasn’t even attempting to run a winning race. Bob Marshall would’ve broken 40%, at least, but that’s because he was attempting to win. Had Davis competed at the primary convention, Marshall would’ve won in a three-way race.


41 posted on 02/06/2016 1:19:11 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

He was part of New Gignrich’s pseduocon army. They were “conservative” in 1994 and 1995, then they dropped that like a hot potato.


42 posted on 02/06/2016 1:23:36 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Why was Gilmore so bad? If I remember, the main problem was Warner could self fund, so he would have way more money than any Republican.


43 posted on 02/06/2016 1:24:47 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Yes, spending was an issue. Warner had close to $14 million and Gilmore had a paltry $2.8 million. Outgoing Sen. John Warner refused to endorse Gilmore, which was seen as a de facto endorsement of Mark (they didn’t come more weasely than John Warner, who rode the corpse of Dick Obenshain to the Senate). Mark Warner also blamed everything on Gilmore (a la “Bush’s fault !”). He led in the polls by 20% (he won by 32%). As it was, running an outsider in Bob Marshall would’ve been better.

I was thinking at the time on FR that it was more prudent to nominate Gilmore and had endorsed him, but he just never got out of the starting gate.


44 posted on 02/06/2016 1:41:34 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
She can't beat Trump.

And at this point, who knows if she'll even be the nominee?

45 posted on 02/06/2016 1:49:10 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

This is at least the THIRD time he has posted his silly vanity in the NEWS section; it’s SPAM now.


46 posted on 02/06/2016 1:50:52 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Just because you feel like it, she can't beat him? The evidence shows otherwise. And the media has been covering for Trump. What happens when they start telling the truth about Trump? He will be a laughing stock?

And at this point, who knows if she'll even be the nominee?

Who knows if Trump will be the nominee? He will get bored and go back to his reality shows. This whole campaign is for his new show Apprentice: Presidential Edition.

47 posted on 02/06/2016 1:52:43 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Why don’t you just ignore it? Liberals are the ones who want to bane everything. If his candidate isn’t going anywhere, then this won’t help. What are you worried about?


48 posted on 02/06/2016 1:54:04 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
That's just NOT so at all!

Trump has tons of "dirt" on the whole Clinton family.

He knows how to beat her; none of the others understand how to do that.

You're only speculating about all of this, without comprehending the situation at all. And your biases are showing, nick. LOL

49 posted on 02/06/2016 1:54:30 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Trump will hopefully be the nominee, or else the Dem will be; especially that COMMIE, Bernie.


50 posted on 02/06/2016 1:56:49 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: refreshed

Keep that up, and I'll make good on a past threat to change my name to nobody then run for office.

BUt look on the bright side.

My brochures would have to read;

Send campaign donations to this address;

51 posted on 02/06/2016 2:03:59 AM PST by BlueDragon (TheHildbeast is so bad, purty near anybody should beat her. And that's saying something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Trump has tons of "dirt" on the whole Clinton family.

LOL. How would he have any dirt? Besides which, IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW MUCH DIRT YOU HAVE ON THE CLINTONS, BECAUSE THEY ARE IMMUNE.

He knows how to beat her; none of the others understand how to do that.

How does he know that? He know zilch about politics? He knows how to Tweet, how to have Kardashian-style trashy reality show, and he's a mid-tier Manhattan real estate developer. Beyond that, he's not good at anything.

You're only speculating about all of this, without comprehending the situation at all.

You are only speculating. I have a lot of facts. When some of his business failures come out, he will look stupid. When people hear the idiotic deposition under oath, he will look like a fool, and it will be clear he knows nothing about economics and nothing about business, except for certain parts of the real estate business.

And your biases are showing, nick. LOL

Which biases? That I am a conservative. That's the important bias here. Bias 2: I don't trust proven liars and people who change their positions all the time.

If Trump were somehow elected, he would switch parties anyway, because that's where all his cronies are. And his boy Corey Lewanbdowski would unleash weaponized amnesty on the country.

52 posted on 02/06/2016 2:05:43 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Well, when Trump allegedly becomes the nominee, get back to me so we can bet. I’d hate to take your money on a sure thing, but maybe you need to learn some life experience.


53 posted on 02/06/2016 2:06:35 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Busko


54 posted on 02/06/2016 2:13:48 AM PST by BlueDragon (TheHildbeast is so bad, purty near anybody should beat her. And that's saying something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Crucial

>> Why are we not considering Jim Gilmore?

He’s running... isn’t he?

Therefore we ARE considering him.

He is garnering less than one percent of the vote, though. May I go out on a limb here and say that he is not a popular choice?


55 posted on 02/06/2016 2:27:17 AM PST by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed was his demon-possessed tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

You don’t think hillary hasn’t seen DT’s FBI file? All that history? LOL just thinking that if she does bring up his liberal past she just might lose all of her voters to him!

The one thing that Trump has in his past is that he has been talking about how politicians have screwed up the economy. I’m going to do some major research into his spoken views. I found his 1991 visit The House Task Force on Urgent Fiscal Issues and am putting together a timeline. Seems it takes some time for legislation to take effect.

I am also going to find out what the supporters of Reaganomics think about DT. THAT is most important if that is why he is supported.


56 posted on 02/06/2016 5:57:08 AM PST by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

who is this guy with the muslim name? Did he win because of the hannity hillary express?


57 posted on 02/06/2016 5:59:26 AM PST by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon

Crowd fund it and you’ll make a million. I might support “nobody.” Especially if I saw it on the ballot.


58 posted on 02/06/2016 9:07:46 AM PST by refreshed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Nifster; txhurl

Careful or I’ll ping the rest of the Gilmore caucus.


59 posted on 02/06/2016 9:09:58 AM PST by refreshed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: refreshed

What all one of them?


60 posted on 02/06/2016 10:54:58 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson