Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

The 70s idea of a modified 747 carrying cruise missiles is back.
1 posted on 02/03/2016 7:00:59 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

Arsenal ship revisited.
Only airborne.


2 posted on 02/03/2016 7:02:08 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

IOW: a more expensive B-52.


3 posted on 02/03/2016 7:04:00 AM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

It actually makes some sense. An F-22 or F-35 flying in front to designate targets, and a cargo plane some distance behind launching long-range missiles at the targets.


4 posted on 02/03/2016 7:05:46 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Such an aircraft would be an easy target for enemy fighter planes.


5 posted on 02/03/2016 7:07:21 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Liberals are the Taliban of America, trying to tear down any symbol that they don't like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

An airborne Yamato. What could go wrong?


9 posted on 02/03/2016 7:17:01 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Plane could carry heavier longer range AA missiles which fighters cannot carry, or carry more to supplement planes when they run out of missiles - since the F-22 is available only very limited quantities - 60 or so operational at any one time, and the F-35 can hardly pack anything (compare with SU-35S) and will also be in limited quantities, they both will run out quickly against swarming massed enemy fighters. (In simulation against advanced enemy planes: the F-22 will only take out 2.5 enemy to 1, and the F-35 is 3.5 lost to 1 enemy those assets will be used up quickly.)


11 posted on 02/03/2016 7:29:34 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Gimme a geosynchronous satellite with a maximum blasto laser and I’ll knock that sucker out of the sky in a microsecond. Sorry ‘bout the young women flying it.


12 posted on 02/03/2016 7:30:17 AM PST by OKSooner (Once you understand that Barack Obama is not on America's side, everything that he does makes sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
Here's your arsenal plane.


14 posted on 02/03/2016 7:33:43 AM PST by Travis T. OJustice (I miss my dad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

For air-to-air combat, this is a silly idea. The Sov, er, Russians have long-ranged AAMs, as do the Euroweenies. Unless the range of AMRAAM is significantly extended, the ‘arsenal plane’ will be in range...
A better trick would be UCAVs armed with missiles working in tandem with the fighters.

However an ‘arsenal plane’ for ground attack - that has potential. A flying barge with tons of various sized PGMs ready to drop...


17 posted on 02/03/2016 8:14:47 AM PST by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Go whole hog - Dig out the plans for the USS Los Angeles. Use the trapeze system to launch drones,


18 posted on 02/03/2016 8:16:21 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Let’s work on keeping the F-35 in the air first, kids.


20 posted on 02/03/2016 8:53:31 AM PST by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

What we need is a Death Star!


22 posted on 02/03/2016 8:58:29 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Falcon 105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
I thought this was an Arsenal plane.


23 posted on 02/03/2016 9:00:43 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

On the Arsenal Plane, the pilot’s seat will swivel a full 360 degrees and will come with a white Persian cat as standard equipment.


24 posted on 02/03/2016 9:01:48 AM PST by Dagnabitt (Islamic Immigration is Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

I think someone gave Ash Carter a copy of Dale Brown’s “Flight of the Old Dog” for Xmas ...


27 posted on 02/03/2016 9:06:55 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
Brought to you by the Obama military brain trust [drumroll]:


28 posted on 02/03/2016 10:40:20 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
negro ass photo: banci negro bcit3.jpg

The caption left but the picture had to stay.
29 posted on 02/03/2016 11:59:38 AM PST by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan; All

Actually the B-1R concept would work well for this. It already included a rotary AMRAAM launcher carrying 40 missiles. It could also fly at F-22 speeds. A little realized fact is that the B-1 has more ordinance capacity than a B-52.

I’m sure this proposal is a lot lamer and more expensive though...


30 posted on 02/03/2016 1:05:12 PM PST by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
"... ordinance ..."

Ordnance?

33 posted on 02/03/2016 7:47:18 PM PST by RobinOfKingston (Just what is the difference between a "centrist democrat" and a "moderate republican?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson