Most folks call me crazy but..FWIW, here’s the Cletus Interpretation for NATURAL Born citizen [after several readings of the Founders writings and The Federalist Papers]:
A child born of 2 US citizens (either natural-born or immigrant/nationalized) and ^either^ on US soil - or while those same parents are abroad and in the public-service of the USA.
No more...no less makes an NBC.
The emmaculation of Obamugabe lowered that standard and we are...simply...STUCK with it.
Legal Precedent is a Bee-Otch.
Flame away.
Could you do us a favor and name the precedent to which you refer?
Sounds right to me and contrary to what some assert it sounds like what was taught in school sixty years ago, at least to the best of my memory. I still say that one can be a citizen at birth but NOT a natural born citizen but what does it all matter. In the end it will turn on who has the mojo without regard to what the truth is.