[TexasFreeper2009]

the non refundable rate would only apply if she were using a bail bondsman, that is their profit.

But she is just paying it all, which should entitle her to get it all back assuming he shows up at trial.

[UCANSEE2]

the non refundable rate would only apply if she were using a bail bondsman, that is their profit. But she is just paying it all, which should entitle her to get it all back assuming he shows up at trial.

That is not what the article says. It says she is at risk for about $2.1 million (which is the 7-10% bail bond fee spoken of in the article).

[UCANSEE2]

I should also say that the article is confusing and says SHE paid the BOND, but in the details further down it is obvious she only paid the BAIL BOND FEE (which is the 10%).

I can see how you or anyone would get misled by that. I was at first, but figured it out after reading the last few sentences.