Well, let's see.....One mentions Jesus and says they've made mistakes and the others are famous for sex video's and twisted family members that aren't sure what sex they are.
I thought a FReeper would know the difference.
KMA
You can take your condescending, uniformed crap and kma.
Bristol is a reality tv celebrity who was teen mom and now birthed another child by another father. Two kids by two different dads and still not married. Yeah, that screams conservative, Christian.
The sleezy Kardashians also claim to know Jesus and live without judging others.
Your point? Other than to try to slam me for posting the obvious.
I get it. I do. She was the daughter of a thought to be star of the conservative movement (who hasn’t been relevant since 2012).
Supporters tried to twist themselves into knots to accept the kid of their hero having a teen pregnancy, called off wedding, etc. I remember posters here, you even, claiming Levi was oh so handsome and a hard worker and they made such a wonderful couple...blah blah blah. Then they broke up. And he was scum. Then they were back together, and he was great again. Then they broke up again and he was scum. Her oldest son also had a child and is not with the mom. Just like millions of others. Why are they special again?
Bristol became a reality tv celebrity and you thought it was great. Sure make your life open to the world. She was on Dancing with the Stars..she had her own reality tv show (just like the Kardashians). But then deal with the backlash of that notoriety. She was a spokesperson for Candies Foundation and she claimed, she claimed! to not have sex again until she was married because she saw what premarital sex does...and now she’s 25 years old, not married, with a child by another father.
Tell me again why she’s better than the Kardashians...Kim has two kids by her husband, father of the two kids. Kourtney has 3 kids with the same father. Bristol, two kids by two different fathers, not married to either.
So what Bristol says and what she does are different and we should be ok with that and still think she’s holding to some standard we put on her?
Yeah. No.
She would have been irrelevant if not for the thousands of so called conservatives who continue to make her relevant even though she doesn’t adhere to anything we espouse.
And here I thought a Freeper would know the difference.