Posted on 12/18/2015 12:38:57 PM PST by SeekAndFind
sheep volunteering to be slaughtered
Who are you going to believe? The Yale elites or your lying eyes?
I wonder if the idiots who signed the petition understood that if the 1st amendment were repealed you could no longer petition the government for redress of grievances.
If they’re liberal they have already accepted tyranny as a key component of government, or, they’re a moron.
And...the GOOD news is that if we are successful in this effort, we will never be bothered by any type of petition again!
"Depends on what the meaning of is is."
Remember when the ivy league actually had standards?
More leadership from an Ivy Plague School.
ask the mindless libs if they are going to vote for Obama again.............
Not really. I'm only 58...
[[Yale University tries to downplay video of students signing ‘petition’ to repeal First Amendment]]
Pathetic that one of the most prestigious universities in the country is full of students that are to stupid to pass an 8th grade civics class.
Why would any parents waste their hardearned money to send their kids to this totally morally bankrupt instiution?
To yell with Hale
RE: Why would any parents waste their hardearned money to send their kids to this totally morally bankrupt instiution?
Let’s face it, morality has little to do with it. The important thing is the idea that you went to an “Ivy League” school.
That gives the stereotypical notion that you have a high IQ and are capable.
The term “ heavily edited” seems to be the new buzz word for slime bags caught on tape.
That’s so very very wrong.
All it means nowadays is that your stupid parents have more money than brains so they can pay the outrageous tuitions for an inferior education at an Ivy Plague college.
Prank? So what? Did the morons sign their name to what they believed was a petition to overturn the 1st Amendment? Then it is what it is.............
Minds Full OF Mush.
What they probably don't understand is that whatever party was in power at the time of the repeal of the First Amendment would very likely be in power for a very long time after.
That party would become the soul arbiter of what was truth, what could and could not be said in public or in private. That party would have complete power of publishing, of the internet and of the airwaves.
They might then suggest that the First Amendment be replaced by something more restrictive but that would still allow free speech but there is not middle ground when it comes to political free speech you either have it or you don't.
Dictator do not accept criticism lightly. Look a Putin his political critics in the press have a very low life expectancy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.