Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
You have to consider that 'autism' has been redefined and broadened as a diagnosis. It may be that no larger a proportion of the population has it, just that the definition has changed.

That does not eliminate other possible factors and would be a study in itself, rendered more difficult by the redefined diagnostic parameters.

4 posted on 12/17/2015 4:26:27 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

Good point. In the old days they would have said “he’s touched” and that would be that. Just like a wide range of diseases were lumped under “natural causes” and “old age”.


14 posted on 12/17/2015 5:34:23 PM PST by Hugin ("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt, Last Man Standing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson