Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
I agree with you, but it was not General Dunford's or his predecessor General Dempsey's decision. This came straight from the NSC, which came from Barkey.

Shame on Lindsey for not forcing the President into a focused policy. As if someone in uniform has any say in that matter.

15 posted on 12/14/2015 9:26:02 AM PST by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Salvavida
ISIL Graham

What is obsession with Assad?

16 posted on 12/14/2015 9:35:35 AM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Salvavida
I didn't say it was Dunford's decision or SecDef for that matter. This comes directly from the WH, which is micromanaging our military operations reminiscent of LBJ and Vietnam.

Grahamnesty, along with Maverick McCain, have their own agenda. They have a military solution to everything. The reason they want to take down Assad is to remove Russian and Iranian influence in the region. So now we have increased Russian and Iranian influence in Syria and the region. Taking out Assad now is not going to change that. And we may get something far worse. What a clusterf#ck.

18 posted on 12/14/2015 10:16:46 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson