...the U.S. wants the word "shall" changed to "should" in a clause on emissions targets out of fears that it might require the Obama administration to seek approval from the Republican-controlled Senate.
That tells me that this "deal" is not legally binding and either Trump or Cruz can tell the thieves at the U.N. that this isn't going to happen.
20 posted on 12/12/2015 11:36:20 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer
(Obama says, the Second Amendment is the greatest recruiting tool that ISIS has.)
That tells me that this “deal” is not legally binding...
Well, whatever part of the deal it’s referring to is not legally binding. The wording was interesting. I get the feeling there may be a lot of “shall’s” and one “should”.
26 posted on 12/12/2015 11:47:16 AM PST by cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)