Posted on 12/12/2015 11:19:56 AM PST by Dave346
Stupid and ignorant and corrupt individuals creating a worthless deal. Only to create a way for a few to get rich of the efforts of many.
Governments have adopted a global climate pact that for the first time asks all countries to limit their greenhouse gas emissions.
Yeah, ok...
the U.S. wants the word “shall” changed to “should”
The difference between “shall” and “should”.
Shall: Don’t do it or else.
Should: Don’t do it or we will be very put out.
Oil for food times a million scam
That tells me that this “deal” is not legally binding...
Like money raised for natural disasters most countries will pledge then never do anything of substance. Once again a bad deal negotiated by the stupid people in our government.
So, it asks for reductions? My answer is a big ‘Hell, NO’! Thanks for asking. These third-world freeloaders will not stop until The West mirrors their hellhole homelands. Time for impeachment proceeding to begin.
This Satellite Monitoring thing will Kill japan because all the Smog will blow in from China
“Governments have adopted a global agreement that for the first time asks...”
Meanwhile an agreement was reached through a consensus of opinion by the populations most affected by those at the meeting to reply as follows: No. Nein. Het. Ne. ...
International taxation/redistribution = Global slavery
These Governments will be thrown out when their home countries find out how much they have to pay
The shalls will make it legally binding and therefore, make it a treaty. To me, making a “deal” with 190 other nations IS a treaty with or without the wording. Obama should be impeached, NOW! He has broken the law and violated the U.S. Constitution. As long as the DemocRATS and their judges continue their social engineering by finding things they want and do not want as being constitutional or unconstitutional, the Constitution is still in effect and IS NOT an “old obsolete piece of paper” as some of the buffoons in the state controlled “media” are now claiming. We can’t let them have it both ways.
Regarding the PC climate change treaty pact, I get the impression that it is no more binding on the US than Obamas Iraq deal. Corrections welcome.
As a reminder to patriots, consider that Congress cannot approve a treaty if it gives Congress the power to do things that the states have never delegated to Congress, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to do.
In fact, based on his experience as vice president and president of the Senate, Thomas Jefferson had essentially clarified that the Senate cannot use its power to negotiate treaties as a way for Congress to bypass the Article V amendment process to create new powers for itself.
”In giving to the President and Senate a power to make treaties, the Constitution meant only to authorize them to carry into effect, by way of treaty, any powers they might constitutionally exercise.” - Thomas Jefferson: The Anas, 1793.
”Surely the President and Senate cannot do by treaty what the whole government is interdicted from doing in any way.” - Thomas Jefferson: Parliamentary Manual, 1812.
A more important example concerning limits on treaty powers comes from a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices. In fact, the Court reflected on Jeffersons words, clarifying that Congress cannot use its power to negotiate treaties as a way to bypass its constitutionally limited powers.
” 2. Insofar as Art. 2(11) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice provides for the military trial of civilian dependents accompanying the armed forces in foreign countries, it cannot be sustained as legislation which is "necessary and proper" to carry out obligations of the United States under international agreements made with those countries, since no agreement with a foreign nation can confer on Congress or any other branch of the Government power which is free from the restraints of the Constitution [emphasis added].” - Reid v. Covert, 1956.
My influence is limited to that which is within or at arms length. Beside the fact that I have been conditioned to abide by the dictates of the laws instituted by those who are impeccably dressed who hold themselves in high esteem. /s
I can’t imagine anyone intends to pay; they’ll swap worthless paper and raise the standards of the ruling classes in the Third World dumps - and that will be all. These wealth transfers from civilized nations to barbaric backwaters have gone on for more than half a century, and done nothing for them. There are still billions of non-white palms outstretched to the dwindling white population; what will they do when those white populations are no longer there?
Would a Senegalese president of France even entertain the notion of sending French wealth to Africa? From the way the educated portions of those populations treat their poor masses now, I doubt it.
Obama is already taking credit for it because of US LEADERSHIP ,Oh My
While they work tirelessly on what might be the problems of the 22nd century, real 21st century problems boil out of control.
-Mark Steyn
Do it and we WILL have civil war.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.