What *scientists* and *evolutionists* like to do is say that since we can’t *prove* our claims, we must accept their theories because they are *scientific*. IOW, since there is no alternative to something they claim they disproved, and theirs is the only other option out there, it must be true.
Problem is, they can’t *prove* theirs either. Scientists tell us constantly that you can’t disprove a theory, you can only disprove it, but then demand that creationists *prove* the creationist position is correct.
They demand that we do what they won’t do themselves.
So let them do what they demand of us.
We claim creationsism. They can disprove it.
It looks to me like Fazal Rana and Hugh Ross, scientists, are making statements that strongly support the Christian, Biblical view of human origins, and are suggesting that there is nothing from science that refutes this view. Indeed they suggest that, if anything, recent scientific findings lend support to the Biblical account.
These guys aren't any kind of Darwinian evolutionist....
Thanks so much for the ping, dear sister in Christ!