Skip to comments.
60 Minutes Didn't Ask Putin about homosexuality (West Coast on now 7pm)
9/27/15
| sff
Posted on 09/27/2015 5:56:16 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Hmmmm....media acquiescence to Putin on social issues.
To: SoFloFreeper
That would be like asking Bill Clintoon about rape.
2
posted on
09/27/2015 5:58:58 PM PDT
by
867V309
(Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
To: SoFloFreeper
Maybe he told them ahead of time - don’t start with your silly American homo nonsense or I’ll walk out.
3
posted on
09/27/2015 5:59:52 PM PDT
by
dainbramaged
(Get out of my country now)
To: SoFloFreeper
That’s because the Putin does not care, one way or the other. It’s just for our political consumption.
4
posted on
09/27/2015 5:59:55 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: dainbramaged
5
posted on
09/27/2015 6:01:13 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: SoFloFreeper
I haven’t watched 60 Minutes for many years.
6
posted on
09/27/2015 6:03:10 PM PDT
by
laplata
( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
To: SoFloFreeper
Who knows what was left on the cutting room floor. Maybe Putin’s answer did not fit 60 Minutes memes. The show notoriously uses several cameras which they claim are always off during the “downtime” banter.
7
posted on
09/27/2015 6:07:24 PM PDT
by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
To: SoFloFreeper
8
posted on
09/27/2015 6:08:42 PM PDT
by
PROCON
To: rollo tomasi
“Who knows what was left on the cutting room floor.”
Agree...I’m sure he was asked - but his answer may have persuaded viewers to his side...so the gay police required that it be removed.
9
posted on
09/27/2015 6:18:51 PM PDT
by
BobL
(REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my 'profile' page))
To: SoFloFreeper
Well, you certainly called out- on a great terminal issue of Our life and times with the soviets. WTF?
To: SoFloFreeper
All I could think was - why did they have the camera so close, you could literally see every pore on Putin’s face?
11
posted on
09/27/2015 6:37:23 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: RedHeeler
Yeah, it is ironic how the media goes 24/7 full blast on sexual behaviour, and then a nation moves to protect its children....and the same media goes ballistic on that nation.
Now, there is a chance to speak to the leader of that nation, and suddenly the gag is (apparently) on.
Instead we got riveting questions like “Do you watch the Republican debates” and “What do you think of Obama”.
To: SoFloFreeper
Although Rose is a MSM Progressive pimp, I think he was a nano-bit smarter than his contemporaries .... don’t ask a question if you know you will not like the answer or one that will make you look foolish .... that’s why he didn’t ask!
13
posted on
09/27/2015 6:47:24 PM PDT
by
RetiredTexasVet
(Arrogance + stupidity + Muslims refugees = an 8th century 3rd world European Union utopia!)
To: 867V309
No that would be like not asking Bill Clinton about chastity.
Or not asking the Pope about rape.
Or not asking Obama about bestiality.
Why would they ask Putin about homosexuality. There’s is no reason to.
14
posted on
09/27/2015 6:49:58 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: SoFloFreeper
15
posted on
09/27/2015 6:50:53 PM PDT
by
Lopeover
(2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States)
To: SoFloFreeper
So asking politicians about homosexuality is to be expected in all interviews now?
16
posted on
09/27/2015 6:51:54 PM PDT
by
GregoTX
(Cruzader)
To: dainbramaged
Charlie Rose must not have thought such questions worthy of asking Vlad during their televised interview.What you said or maybe he just didn't want to risk a punch in the mouth.
17
posted on
09/27/2015 6:56:32 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: DannyTN
No that would be like not asking Bill Clinton about chastity. Or not asking the Pope about rape. Or not asking Obama about bestiality. Why would they ask Putin about homosexuality. Theres is no reason to.
Well, asking putin about queers would validate and spread his country's stance against homosexuality. Strictly verboten bythe LSM.
Asking Clintoon about rape would totally violate the media's blackout of his criminality.
Pope whats-his-name's got nothing to do with it.
18
posted on
09/27/2015 7:06:16 PM PDT
by
867V309
(Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
To: 867V309
I see your reasoning now but don’t think it was obvious.
I was going for the more literal...
Not asking Puting about a perversity that he wants nothing to do with.... is like....
Not asking Clinton about chastity that he wants nothing to do with... or like....
Not asking the pope about another perversity, rape, that the pope would want nothing to do with....or like...
Not asking Obama about another perversity, bestiality, that there is no evidence, unless Michelle is not human, that he wants nothing to do with.
19
posted on
09/27/2015 7:24:49 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: DannyTN
I was going for the more literal...
OK. Got it. :)
20
posted on
09/27/2015 7:35:29 PM PDT
by
867V309
(Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson