Posted on 09/27/2015 5:56:16 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
Anyone watch Charlie Rose didn't get in Vlad's face about homosexuality in tonight's interview.
For YEARS now, the American media has screamed bloody murder about Russia not celebrating homosexuality. Laws to protect children were passed....but the media called it oppression.
Charlie Rose must not have thought such questions worthy of asking Vlad during their televised interview.
That would be like asking Bill Clintoon about rape.
Maybe he told them ahead of time - don’t start with your silly American homo nonsense or I’ll walk out.
That’s because the Putin does not care, one way or the other. It’s just for our political consumption.
+1
I haven’t watched 60 Minutes for many years.
Who knows what was left on the cutting room floor. Maybe Putin’s answer did not fit 60 Minutes memes. The show notoriously uses several cameras which they claim are always off during the “downtime” banter.
“Who knows what was left on the cutting room floor.”
Agree...I’m sure he was asked - but his answer may have persuaded viewers to his side...so the gay police required that it be removed.
Well, you certainly called out- on a great terminal issue of Our life and times with the soviets. WTF?
All I could think was - why did they have the camera so close, you could literally see every pore on Putin’s face?
Yeah, it is ironic how the media goes 24/7 full blast on sexual behaviour, and then a nation moves to protect its children....and the same media goes ballistic on that nation.
Now, there is a chance to speak to the leader of that nation, and suddenly the gag is (apparently) on.
Instead we got riveting questions like “Do you watch the Republican debates” and “What do you think of Obama”.
Although Rose is a MSM Progressive pimp, I think he was a nano-bit smarter than his contemporaries .... don’t ask a question if you know you will not like the answer or one that will make you look foolish .... that’s why he didn’t ask!
No that would be like not asking Bill Clinton about chastity.
Or not asking the Pope about rape.
Or not asking Obama about bestiality.
Why would they ask Putin about homosexuality. There’s is no reason to.
And why not? Cowards!
So asking politicians about homosexuality is to be expected in all interviews now?
What you said or maybe he just didn't want to risk a punch in the mouth.
I see your reasoning now but don’t think it was obvious.
I was going for the more literal...
Not asking Puting about a perversity that he wants nothing to do with.... is like....
Not asking Clinton about chastity that he wants nothing to do with... or like....
Not asking the pope about another perversity, rape, that the pope would want nothing to do with....or like...
Not asking Obama about another perversity, bestiality, that there is no evidence, unless Michelle is not human, that he wants nothing to do with.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.