So, no evidence.
Just an assumption. An opinion.
That’s fine, but don’t you think you should be more clear on that?
You may very well be right, but your headline would lead one to believe this is something you know to be fact, or that details from the story naturally lead to that conclusion.
The presence of so much blood mitigates against a hoax, IMO.
Whether the crime is one of gay-bashing, we’ll have to see.
The victim suffered a possible skull fracture but was talking to police early this morning and believes he was targeted because he’s gay.
Like muzzies, sodomites are skilled in taqiya. Based on previous incidents of this type, they claim they're "targeted" to cover up, for lack of a better phrase, a "lover's" spat. Occam's Razor shows this is invariably the case for these so-called hate crimes. The logical default position is to treat these as false flags until proved otherwise.
The faggies have cried wolf sooooooo many times in the past decade that a reliable pattern of pathological lying to garner attention has been established beyond much doubt.
THAT is your evidence.