Uh, I don’t think it will be another Fukushima.
Those reactors were flooded by the sea, and Diablo Canyon is up on cliffs above the sea.
Something that many people do not know, is that the licensing process requires those seeking the license to extensively review the geologic history of the area, including its history of tsunamis. It wouldn’t have been licensed if there was a chance it would be damaged by a tsunami.
The only reason I can think of as to why it has been dubbed California’s potential Fukushima is because of all the crybabies in California.
No, because of gaia worshippers everywhere. But the ones here in California will not be satisfied until 50% of all the state is covered by solar panels/reflectors and windmills, the residents are bankrupted by high utility bills(except the illegals who will receive taxpayer assistance) and all industry is driven out. That's their way of protecting gaia, by eliminating humans.
I’m about as pro nuclear power as you get....but, this site has a few issues:
Construction was run by the Unions.
Union workers had contests to see who could go the longest without actually doing any work....those periods were measured in weeks.
The Unions had the Quality Control staff intimidated, so many flaws went unreported.
Unit 2 was pretty far along before they recognized it was constructed 180 degrees out of synch from the design.
Aside from all of that, the enviro-whackos, who disapprove of ANY effective electric power generation, don’t care whether there are any real issues with the facility. They just want it shut down.