Skip to comments.
First State Legalizes Taser Drones for Cops, Thanks to a Lobbyist
The Daily Beast ^
| 08/26/2015
| Justin Glawe
Posted on 08/26/2015 6:36:39 AM PDT by Rusty0604
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: Macoozie
So, we must now assume that ALL drones are locked & loaded.
We have the right to defend ourselves, others and our property. 
21
posted on
08/26/2015 7:43:01 AM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(I prep because DHS and FEMA told me it was a good idea...)
To: Macoozie
A man in NJ was indicted for firing a shotgun at a drone near his home. Of course NJ has restrictive guns laws.
To: Rusty0604
So? Just go get one of those Colorado Drone Huntin’ Licenses.
23
posted on
08/26/2015 1:18:01 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
To: Rusty0604
People should be able to have drones, but they should also be able to shoot a drone spying on their property.Philippine FARCO 51 cal CO2 shotgun. (The downside is they want $400) At least they couldn't bust you for using a firearm in city limits.
24
posted on
08/26/2015 4:28:24 PM PDT
by
Oatka
(This is America. Assimilate or evaporate. [URL=http://media.photobucket.com/user/currencyjunkie/me)
To: Rusty0604
What could POSSIBLY go wrong.
25
posted on
08/27/2015 7:25:11 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
To: Rusty0604
Oh, and:
“Requiring a search warrant for surveillance is ‘restricting development’?” asked Rep. Gary Paur, a Republican, at a hearing.
“It’s really all about the commercial development, which is where all of this is heading,” Lund replied. “If [a law] is somehow limiting commercial, law enforcement development... that is a negative in terms of companies looking and investing in opportunities in the state of North Dakota,” Lund said.
Words just don't mean anything any more.
26
posted on
08/27/2015 7:27:31 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
To: Lazamataz
Words just don't mean anything any more. That's exactly how the Soviet system operated.
To: EternalVigilance
You know the awful part?
I predicted this all, way back in 2005.
The corruption of the Republicans, the turn towards Sovietism in America.
It appears that we who study history are doomed to watch those who don’t study history, repeat it.
28
posted on
08/27/2015 7:41:33 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
To: null and void
29
posted on
08/27/2015 7:44:43 PM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(A Ted Cruz Happy Warrior! GO TED!)
To: Lazamataz
30
posted on
08/27/2015 7:47:48 PM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(A Ted Cruz Happy Warrior! GO TED!)
To: TADSLOS
31
posted on
08/27/2015 7:50:32 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
To: Lazamataz
Especially the words in the constitution.
Of course, if someone says anything that could somehow be construed as offensive to some group then words mean everything.
To: Lazamataz
Lots of us have been flying the warning flags for years.
Sadly, few seem to want to listen, until it’s too late.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
