Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First State Legalizes Taser Drones for Cops, Thanks to a Lobbyist
The Daily Beast ^ | 08/26/2015 | Justin Glawe

Posted on 08/26/2015 6:36:39 AM PDT by Rusty0604

It is now legal for law enforcement in North Dakota to fly drones armed with everything from Tasers to tear gas thanks to a last-minute push by a pro-police lobbyist.

With all the concern over the militarization of police in the past year, no one noticed that the state became the first in the union to allow police to equip drones with “less than lethal” weapons. House Bill 1328 wasn’t drafted that way, but then a lobbyist representing law enforcement—tight with a booming drone industry—got his hands on it.

The bill’s stated intent was to require police to obtain a search warrant from a judge in order to use a drone to search for criminal evidence. In fact, the original draft of Rep. Rick Becker’s bill would have banned all weapons on police drones.

(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: drones; lawenforcement; police
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 08/26/2015 6:36:40 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

More toys for the no-knock SWAT raid lobby.


2 posted on 08/26/2015 6:40:18 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Drones for thee but not for we.

Just wait, it’s coming.


3 posted on 08/26/2015 6:43:08 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

The thundering march of totatitarian statism...


4 posted on 08/26/2015 6:45:52 AM PDT by WayneS (Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

With all the raids at wrong addresses, what could go wrong?


5 posted on 08/26/2015 6:45:57 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

We should pair this post with the one on shotgun shells for drones.


6 posted on 08/26/2015 6:46:47 AM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck
I agree ... AND ...

understand a legitimate purpose

(I love, yet I hate, you ask how can this be?
I know not, but feel the agony ... Gaius Valerius Catullus)


Drones fly faster than cars drive and a rapid response to an officer in trouble MIGHT save his life


admittedly ... I'm conflicted.

7 posted on 08/26/2015 6:46:51 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
And we are entrusting the technology to these people.
8 posted on 08/26/2015 6:48:37 AM PDT by GoneSalt (*NOOB*~What separates winners from the losers is how a person reacts to each new twist of fate~TRUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Merde!


9 posted on 08/26/2015 6:48:56 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

I said the same thing in the thread about the man shooting down a drone supposedly filming his sunbathing daughter. Many on freerepublic were for banning drones. I had posters acting like I was crazy suggesting the citizens will need drones to maintain the balance of power and should not be banned or even regulated for that matter.


10 posted on 08/26/2015 6:49:49 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knarf

If the use was limited to situations such as you described. I just don’t have faith that it will.


11 posted on 08/26/2015 6:53:39 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Armed drones. What could possibly go wrong???


12 posted on 08/26/2015 6:53:50 AM PDT by null and void (Send them all back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

I agree ... I confessed my conflict.


13 posted on 08/26/2015 6:54:34 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

14 posted on 08/26/2015 6:57:22 AM PDT by null and void (Send them all back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

People should be able to have drones, but they should also be able to shoot a drone spying on their property.


15 posted on 08/26/2015 6:57:25 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

I’d be surprised they’ll let this “fly” in ND.


16 posted on 08/26/2015 6:57:32 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

I missed that thread, I’m surprised that FReepers were for banning drone ownership.


17 posted on 08/26/2015 6:58:46 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Well, definitely not visiting North Dakota anytime soon.


18 posted on 08/26/2015 7:30:49 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

So, we must now assume that ALL drones are locked & loaded.
We have the right to defend ourselves, others and our property.
Blow them out of the sky, or maybe get a modified laser and zap ‘em.
Either way they are now a “threat” and can be dealt with appropriately.


19 posted on 08/26/2015 7:34:56 AM PDT by Macoozie ("Estoy votando por Ted 2016!" bumper stickers available)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void; Nachum; Kartographer; LucyT; butterdezillion; INVAR; Dick Bachert; GOPJ; BCW; ...
H/T to our FRiend Rusty0604 for the post.

The whole article has lots of nifty nuggets therein...

For thus has the Lord said unto me:
“Go, set a watchman, Let him declare what he sees.”
Isaiah 21:6

The Watchman Ping List - FReepmail Old Sarge for details!

20 posted on 08/26/2015 7:42:18 AM PDT by Old Sarge (I prep because DHS and FEMA told me it was a good idea...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson