Posted on 08/24/2015 2:42:54 PM PDT by conservativejoy
Putting together the information now publicly available, the question has to be asked: Did an ISIS hack of Hillary Clinton’s virtually defenseless home brew server set up the death of Ambassador Christopher Stevens?
ISIS has proven itself adept enough at information technology that a successful hack of Hillary Clinton’s server at her Chappaqua mansion cannot be ruled out, no matter how many Secret Service members stood guard. Apparently unbeknownst to the former secretary of state who boasted of the server’s security because of the guards outside, it is so easy to hack a garden variety server set up by a mom-and-pop operation that an ISIS (and Russian intelligence and Chinese and Romanian and many other agencies) hack is well within the realm of possibility.
Now consider what the New York Post reported yesterday, six paragraphs into a story. Paul Sperry writes:
US intelligence officials so far have determined that at least four — and as many as 305 — of the more than 30,000 e-mails Clinton and her aides have printed out and turned over to investigators were classified at the time they were written.
They include a 2011 message from Clinton’s top aides that contains military intelligence from United States Africa Command gleaned from satellite images of troop movements in Libya, along with the travel and protection plans for Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who was later killed in a terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya. Another staff e-mail sent to Clinton in 2012 contained investigative data about Benghazi terrorist suspects wanted by the FBI. (emphasis added)
If the travel and protection plans for Ambassador Stevens were known to ISIS on September 10, 2011, then setting up the attack that resulted in his and three other Americans’ deaths would have been considerably aided.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Most likely the case.
No, the most likely scenario is that she set him up on purpose because he knew too much about things that would get her hanged. She has quite the record of that, you know.
It’s still blood on her hands. She had the duty to call for security and didn’t. And then ask for help and didn’t. Some CIC!! Dereliction of duty!!
Q - Why, during Hiliarly’s term as Secretary of State, wasn’t she the target of terrorists?
A - Why would terrorists attack one of their natural ALLIES?
I agree. I believe she set him up because he knew too much about the funneling or weapons into Syria and ISIS through Libya.
Interesting.
Oh man that would be messed up. So wrong.
And which gives here a perfect (new) excuse “It wasn’t me that told them to “stand down”, it was Russian hackers!”
You got it wrong. This is all due to a video put together by some guy out in Southern California.
He served a year in prison.
So, what difference does it make?
Yes. We know that more than one email exposed his location
Some one set them up the Al-Qaeda bomb!
Excellent Points!
BAM!
This is the question that needs to be asked over and over...
DID A HACKED HILLARY EMAIL RESULT IN THE DEATH OF OUR LYBIAN AMBASSADOR!
Hillary didn’t set Stevens up, he was in on it.
The Navy SEALS fighting back when they weren’t supposed to is what got him killed. The terrorist thought they had been double crossed.
and cover story was ready before the event actually happened
also a possibility, agreed
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.