Why, then, do you suppose 0% Lindsay Graham is still in the race?
And Perry?
And Pataki?
The bit, in that link, about the superpac funding changes is eye opening and explains how candidates who have no money can still stay in the race.
What possibly other purpose could that indicate? Why should someone with 0% polling. week on week, and NO MONEY stay in a race for president?
Anecdotal evidence does have its merits, but it is still nonetheless...anecdotal after all.
Pataki, Perry, Christie and Rubio aren’t pulling from The Donald, they are pulling from Jeb Bush if anyone.