Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Napsalot

If air-to-air combat is no longer relevant, why do we need an Air Force with all its beaurucratic tail and headquarters? Air-to-air stemmed from the need to protect manned bombers from other fighters. No with all the so called smart munitions, unmanned aircraft (which could be bombers), long range missiles, etc, why do we need an Air Force? Let it revert back to the Army, and in some cases to the Navy. DOD would save a whole hell of a lot of taxpayer money. I know that never crosses the mind of many in the Pentagon. It is too entrenched in old beauracracies and keeping traditions over saving money. The age old slogan continues...if you don’t spend it you lose it.


6 posted on 07/29/2015 6:47:54 AM PDT by Bobby_Taxpayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bobby_Taxpayer

“why do we need an Air Force with all its beaurucratic tail and headquarters? “

It’s the golf courses.


14 posted on 07/29/2015 7:10:37 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson