Posted on 06/24/2015 6:17:21 PM PDT by Enlightened1
Why is the the Confederate Battle Flag/culture under 1st Amendment attack (the Right of free speech) because 1 lone nut killed 9 people in a church?
However, these same "brave" politicians/media DO NOT HOLD THE SAME STANDARD..., to the culture that killed over 3000 people on September 11th, 2001?
Oh I know... because we cannot blame an entire group of people for what happened by 19 nuts on September 11th, 2001.
Okay so then why are we now blaming an entire group of people for 1 lone nut?
Just saying....
You are too LOGICAL, Enlightened1. Logic does not figure into the Alinsky Mind Control the Liberals love so much. It is do as they say, hate whom they hate, and be quick about it or they will mow you down with the liberal press and the multitude of nuts they own.
It’s nothig to lose your head over. </sarc >
If it wasn’t this guy shooting 9 people it would have been something else to stir the pot.
Hillary had intended to run for president in 2004 and part of her campaign was a call for reparations for slavery.
That’s what this is all about, Hillary is going to call for reparations for slavery.
That’s why someone needs to beat her to the punch and call for reparations for slavery from the democrat party since the dem party is the party of slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow and every other racist policy.
Very good post!I agree most heartily.
Thank you! Nice to know there are still some clear heads around who can still think for themselves. Frankly, I think our numbers are dwindling due to the stampeding of those who just can’t wait to be part of the cattle herd.
simply brilliant
I think that they will mow you down the way you describe, but there will come a time when they will mow you down with bullets. I don't see this ending peacefully.
Maybe they’re trying to distract from the epidemic of fatherlessness that they’ve pushed for several decades.
That is Why we must defend our 2nd Amendment. Without it we are helpless.
I can't help but think that the government is going to conduct a massive gun grab sometime in the future. If they are successful, then they will start mowing you down with bullets. 2nd amendment forever.
Excellent observation.
So be it! If they try a gun grab, I don’t think it will succeed. Yes, I’m a woman, but I have never lived my life in fear. I am not a plastic barbie doll empty headed scardy- cat. If the time comes, somebody is going out with me.
Naked Communist traitors marched and rioted in the streets of America in the 60s and 70s carrying the North Vietnamese military’s flag.
Ef a bunch of hypocritical commies.
I think there’s a photo of John Kerry sitting in front of the communist Vietnamese flag.
For people that proclaimed to be “anti-war” they were decidedly PRO-North Vietname military. The war crimes committed by their chosen side are ignored when the war is discussed on television.
The war didn’t end when the US left. The so-called peace activists should’ve continued their protests against the war until the North Vietnamese ended their aggression.
Hillary had intended to run in 2004 but Charles Barron in August of 2002 derailed her dirty tricks campaign when he promised “Scorched Earth”, meaning race riots, in every city in the US if they didn’t get reparations for slavery.
Hillary had already hitched her wagon to the reparations for slavery crowd and didn’t want to be associated with orchestrated race riots so the idea was dropped and they never tried to take it any further.
Hillary’s second dirty tricks campaign for the 2004 election was also derailed by Charles Barron when C Barron let it be known the Nick Berg video had been orchestrated with the terrorist and the CBS news story on Abu Graub prison. The video per Charles Barron was supposed to symbolize the plight of the black man in Americas prisons.
Both of Hillary’s dirty tricks campaigns she intended to use in 2004 are back in the news again today.
That COULD explain why Queen Sheila Jackson Lee was strongly behind Hillary's 2008 campaign (in opposition of Barack Obama).
I’m still of the opinion Obama was never supposed to be elected.
I believe Obama was supposed to be taken right up to the edge then declared ineligible to be president which would have kicked off race riots, actually a race war, in every city like we have never seen before.
Hillary would have been launched into the WH with virtually dictatorial powers.
Straight out of the 1960s Weather Underground playbook.
Hillary intended to run in 2004 and race riots were planned over reparations for slavery.
We’re see the Weather Underground playbook at work right now.
Bill Clintons 1992 election there were race riots.
With B Clinton’s 1996 election race riots were planned as the Chinese military were caught arming up the LA gangs with full auto weapons.
With B Clinton’s impeachment there was threats of a “Scorched Earth” which were race riots if Clinton was impeached and removed from office.
When a Clinton is running for the WH or wants to stay in the WH you can guarantee there is going to be race riots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.