Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

It’s not pushing drugs to children. It’s a stupid candy, doesn’t look like pot, doesn’t taste like pot, isn’t pot, doesn’t really have anything to do with pot, except a stupid name. Which was probably chosen knowing it would irritate whiny people, thus generating news stories, thus free publicity.

Percentage of smokers was very high for decades before anybody invented candy cigarettes. And it was a generation that grew up on candy cigarettes that started us down the path of not smoking. Smoking led to the candy, not the other way around.


17 posted on 06/17/2015 3:06:57 PM PDT by discostu (In fact funk's as old as dirt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
You can't be serious, it has the pot leaves right on it "liquid weed", it is all about the Marijuana look.

By the way, Candy cigarettes first hit the market in the early 1930s, by 1970 they toned them down in packaging and quit calling them cigarettes as the feds considered a national law, in 1967 North Dakota banned them.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

22 posted on 06/17/2015 3:27:32 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson