He doesn’t have to conclude anything more than more probable than not. That is the standard the NFL is using.
This is the same standard used by US civil courts.
Stop being a shady-brady jock sniffer.
I don’t care about Brady or his jock.
The NFL didn’t prove he did anything. That’s what I care about.
If you are going to take action against someone, you should first know that they actually did something.
The only thing more probable than not means to me is that they don’t know one way or the other.
Thank You. :)
Yeah. He shouldn’t be a Brady jock-sniffer.
He should be more like the standard bovine, mindless, adolescent 16 year old football fans that whine because they can’t understand that sometimes a team wins because they are disciplined and practice hard, and not because the refs had it out for their team, or the other team cheated.
Like 90% of the vitriol you read on these forums.