Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/03/2015 3:27:19 AM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyX
Playing the Devil's Advocate:

In 1938 the great powers met in Munich to determine the fate of the Sudetenland, a territory belonging to Czechoslovakia. Even though the Soviet Union was a great power, and had an obvious interest in the region, it was not invited to the conference.

As we all know, Britain and France caved in to Hitler. Stalin learned a lesson from all that. The British and French were weak. The initiative belonged to Germany.

So Stalin allied with Hitler, not out of any common cause, but because the West would not stand up to Germany.

(Again, this is a Devil's Advocate viewpoint...just something to think about.)

2 posted on 05/03/2015 3:44:33 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyX

What a crock. The Nazis were Leftists the same as the Communists. They were two scorpions in a bottle fighting for power. The Nazis won.


3 posted on 05/03/2015 3:55:28 AM PDT by jmacusa (Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyX
For starters, the Moscow-controlled Communist International, and its sidekick, the Communist Party of Germany, made Hitler’s rise to power possible...

Can we thusly blame the Republican Party with their loser platform, their ABSOLUTE COMPLETE LOSER candidates and the traitorous quislings which they have seated in the US Senate and House for the national nightmare of Øbama?

YES WE CAN!

4 posted on 05/03/2015 4:13:49 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyX

I find it interesting that the author of this article used the theological term “hypostasis” in describing the current Post-Soviet Russian regime.

It is a term used in traditional Christiology describing the nature of Christ as 100% God and 100% Man at the same time, existing in reality with one another. In our own time-space continuum, nothing can be 100% one thing and 100% another thing at the same time, but in Christ, we accept it by Faith.

In the context of post-Soviet Russia, is the author implying that it is still 100% communist even though it claims to be 100% NOT?

I found the use of the term fascinating! :-)


7 posted on 05/03/2015 5:39:29 AM PDT by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyX

I will acknowledge those Red Army soldiers who fought for their Motherland against a hideous foe, despite their leadership, they didn’t choose their leaders, they were fighting for their families.

I refuse to praise Stalin, or the system that needlessly killed millions more than needed to be killed. And the oppression they brought on so many nations after the war.


20 posted on 05/03/2015 3:16:50 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyX

Stalin wanted the war in the West, to bleed the British, French and German armies dry, making all of Europe easy pickings for the Red Army.

The one thing Stalin didn’t count on was France falling so soon, which may have turned out in the end to be a blessing in disguise.


21 posted on 05/03/2015 3:20:26 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson