Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: all the best

Interesting point. Kate was in the public eye for years and at the center of the off again / on again relationship with William. Diana was a bit of a surprise to the press and public, and the marriage to Charles occurred relatively quickly. I think a long time seeing and hearing “Kate Middleton” in the media may be the reason. Thoughts?


17 posted on 05/02/2015 5:16:50 AM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: twister881

I often hear “Middleton” on these shores but what surprise me is that it was a British newspaper in this post that called her by her maiden name. After 4 years people should know who she is as D of C. Maybe it’s because it’s D of C rather than Princess Kate. D of C is perhaps a bit formal and faceless. Compare “D of C” to “Princess Diana”. I think that might explain it.


18 posted on 05/02/2015 5:23:27 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: twister881; All

The only people who refer to her as such is ‘the media’ who always presume a familiarity they have not earned.

When it was Diana they referred to her by her first name only conveniently omitting the Princess title when they felt like it.


36 posted on 05/02/2015 7:00:22 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson