Thank you, Ray. I did hear this report a couple of days ago, on GRETA.
I am now surprised that you are surprised. Gowdy has been excellent at drawing pictures for you, from the beginning, dealing with everyone’s expectations and the scope of his investigation.
A couple of things, come to mind. The direct evidence that Gowdy expected eventually to get to, through the normal process, is now destroyed by the witness herself, Hillary Clinton. It was never housed at State at all, and Gowdy forced that information into the media spotlight.
The other problem is that the HOR committee only gets two shots at Hillary Clinton, according to Trey. Hillary wanted to burn one of those two appearances, by coming last month, BEFORE Gowdy had any direct evidence, or the emails.
If you are a prosecutor, would you want that interview before you have evidence against her, or after? What prosecutor wants to wear a soup bowl on his head in public, before he possesses some or in this case, any, direct evidence?
Besides, what’s wrong with thwarting the Clinton machine efforts to get all of these scandals swept up and out of the way by crunch time next year, nearer to the general election.
So, if Benghazi can be outlined at a time inconvenient for Hillary, and convenient for us, that suits me just fine too.
Thx for thinking of me. Rita :/
You miss the point entirely.