Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homeless Man Discovers Forgotten Bank Account
wfts ^ | Apr 16, 2015 | Carson Chambers

Posted on 04/17/2015 3:16:45 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Tampa police officer, case worker help him

John Helinski was once homeless, sleeping on a cardboard box by a bus stop.

"I just managed on my own,” said John Helinski.

For three years in downtown Tampa, he said he was invisible.

"Sleeping underneath the benches there and no one would see me,” Helinski said.

Now Helinski's got a locker, a bed and a dedicated case worker at a new 24/7, one-stop-shop housing center for homeless in Hillsborough County off 50th Street.

But wait, his story gets way better than that — way, way better.

"He needed to have an identification, but we couldn't get an identification without a birth certificate,” said DACCO Case Manager Charles Inman. “There was no other option to succeed. You know, the thought of putting a 62-year-old man back on the street wasn't acceptable."

Inman wasn't going to give up and Tampa Police Officer Dan McDonald isn't the quitting kind either.

"I enjoy it because I like a challenge,” said Officer McDonald.

They got Helinski, who was born in Poland but is an American citizen, a driver's license, a Social Security card and his name back.

"We first had to figure out that we needed a consular record of foreign birth or something like that,” said Officer McDonald.

But wait, it gets even better.

At a Tampa bank branch, Helinski discovered an old, forgotten bank account.

"At that time, it was Landmark Bank. Then it became Bank of America,” he said.

The bank account has money in it. His Social Security benefits had been piling up for years, enough for Helinski to buy permanent housing.

"I guess I'm exhilarated, excited, you know,” he said.

"I think we were both stunned. We weren't quite sure what to say,” said Officer McDonald.

How much better could it get?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Local News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 04/17/2015 3:16:45 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Great story.


2 posted on 04/17/2015 3:19:38 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
How much better could it get?

Now he gets to pay the back taxes and penalties on those benefits.

-PJ

3 posted on 04/17/2015 3:22:13 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Many states would have confiscated “unclaimed” funds like this years ago.


4 posted on 04/17/2015 3:24:00 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

...enter the IRS, stage right.


5 posted on 04/17/2015 3:26:30 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper

Yeah, I wouldn’t have said a word.


6 posted on 04/17/2015 3:28:09 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (The White House is now known as "Casa Blanca".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

And when he found it, it turned out he owed the bank $657.34 in low balance and overdraft fees.


7 posted on 04/17/2015 3:30:50 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
""At that time, it was Landmark Bank. Then it became Bank of America,” he said. The bank account has money in it. His Social Security benefits had been piling up for years..."


"That poor bank."

8 posted on 04/17/2015 3:33:13 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Well, if he had no other income during those years, he might be lucky and have a low enough income to avoid the taxes.

It’s extra lame though that they tax social security benefits, when they already taxed him on his income that they deducted the social security contributions from.


9 posted on 04/17/2015 3:34:06 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

If he’s 62, why was he getting SS benefits? SSDI?


10 posted on 04/17/2015 3:41:11 PM PDT by sockmonkey (Of course I didn't read the article. After all, this is Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

We have it in NY. I found about $700 in dividends.


11 posted on 04/17/2015 3:41:52 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey

While the full retirement age has increased, 62 is still the age when you can claim a reduced benefit, assuming you qualify based on time worked.


12 posted on 04/17/2015 3:43:02 PM PDT by nascarnation (Impeach, convict, deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation; sockmonkey

Don’t some distributions begin at 59.5?


13 posted on 04/17/2015 3:45:06 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I’m not sure.
The software I used to “optimize” my claiming date said 62 was the earliest possible in my situation.


14 posted on 04/17/2015 3:46:08 PM PDT by nascarnation (Impeach, convict, deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey

My question too.

Something does not add up.

Why was he getting SS benefits for years and why was he seeminging unaware of the account that was holding those benefits?


15 posted on 04/17/2015 3:48:48 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Nice, BUT ... how many SS checks would have been backed up for a 62 year old man? Unless he had SSI, not much.


16 posted on 04/17/2015 3:49:04 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey

Yes....Disability benefits explain it.


17 posted on 04/17/2015 3:49:29 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I think 59.5 is for simple 401k’s that involve one company.


18 posted on 04/17/2015 3:51:22 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Something’s wrong with this story.

A 62 YO man wouldn’t have ‘years’ of SS checks piled up.
.


19 posted on 04/17/2015 3:53:44 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman; Political Junkie Too

Social security is not taxable unless your other income is above $34,000.


20 posted on 04/17/2015 3:56:45 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson