Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Considering Repeal of Death Tax
American Legislator ^ | 4-16-15 | Will Freeland

Posted on 04/16/2015 2:25:22 PM PDT by ThethoughtsofGreg

For the first time in just over a decade, the U.S. House of Representatives today will vote on a bill to abolish the death tax, otherwise known the federal estate tax. H.R. 1105—the “Death Tax Repeal Act of 2015″—has bipartisan support, which is evident by its co-sponsors: Congressmen Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Sanford Bishop (D-Georgia).

Attempts to repeal the federal death tax acknowledge what the 32 states without a death tax already understand: a tax on an individual’s personal property, business assets and investments, even with a $5 million exemption, results in high compliance costs, little revenue and bad incentives.

Representatives of the 50 states have called for the repeal of the federal death tax through ALEC model policy. As the ALEC Resolution to Permanently Repeal the Federal Unified Gift and Estate Tax notes, “The Federal Unified Gift and Estate Tax, or the ‘Death Tax’ has been identified as destructive to job opportunity and expansion. The ‘Death Tax’ generates only a minimal amount of Federal Revenue, yet enormous dollars are spent in collecting and administering these taxes and in useless lawyers’ and accountants’ time and expense as people try to avoid this punitive ‘double tax.’ In order to pay the taxes, heirs must sell family businesses. This resolution calls upon the U.S. Congress to permanently repeal the Federal Unified Gift and Estate Tax.”

(Excerpt) Read more at americanlegislator.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: deathtax; liberals

1 posted on 04/16/2015 2:25:22 PM PDT by ThethoughtsofGreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

the current crop of newly minted black upper class is getting older.

wouldn’t want any of that wealth redistribution to effect them, now would we...


2 posted on 04/16/2015 2:27:37 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

I wonder if the President will sign this. Going to be an interesting fight in the Senate. Maybe Schumer will tack on a reparations tax to this.


3 posted on 04/16/2015 2:31:49 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Islam, the Communists enforcers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

Yeah I’m sure zer0 will gladly sign that (do I have to post, ‘sarc’)


4 posted on 04/16/2015 2:32:54 PM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

So what spending are they going to cut to make up for the lost revenue?


5 posted on 04/16/2015 2:33:13 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg
Although a good idea it plays right into the hands of the Former Twelfth Lady.It's not hard to imagine the attack ads.
6 posted on 04/16/2015 2:38:25 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obama;A Low Grade Intellect With Even Lower Morals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

Bipartisan? Technically yes.

Seven Democrats voted for it. Three Republicans voted against it.

It doesn’t sound like there’s sufficient support in the Senate to overcome a filibuster.


7 posted on 04/16/2015 2:42:20 PM PDT by ConstantSkeptic (Be careful about preconceptions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

I guess we’ll need to find out what Obama wants so McConnell will know what he’s supposed to do.


8 posted on 04/16/2015 2:43:25 PM PDT by savedbygrace (But God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg; All
Thank you for referencing that article ThethoughtsofGreg. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

"Congress Considering Repeal of Death Tax"

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

There is no clause in Congress’s constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to justify the corrupt House establishing a death tax. In fact, the Supreme Court has clarified that Congress is prohibited from laying taxes in the name of state power issues, essentially any issue which Congress cannot justify under its Section 8-limited powers.

“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

So since the corrupt, popularly elected Senate failed to kill the bill that established the death tax, this issue is another example why state lawmakers shouldn’t have ratified the ill-conceived 17th Amendment, foolishly giving up the voices of state lawmakers in Congress by doing so.

The 17th Amendment needs to disappear.

9 posted on 04/16/2015 2:48:12 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

Interesting. A lot of estate planners would have to get a real job ...


10 posted on 04/16/2015 2:49:48 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I'm a radical feminist. Galatians 3:28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

The revenue generated by the tax appears to be negligible. No need to cut spending if that is the case.


11 posted on 04/16/2015 2:50:09 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

Estate tax repealed by House 240-179;12 NV

HR 1105

Roll Call 161

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll161.xml


12 posted on 04/16/2015 2:58:51 PM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

Few legislators give up power foolishly. They traded it for something they perceived to be better. That we let them is the crime.

You’ll note that the 17th was repealed after a wave of massive immigration from countries with illiberal cultures. They settled in cities and fell for Democrat talking points.

It’s been a mess for over a century.


13 posted on 04/16/2015 3:27:00 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

FReepers! Let's go!
Everyone needs to help!


Please contribute today!

14 posted on 04/16/2015 3:32:21 PM PDT by RedMDer (Keep Free Republic Alive with YOUR Donations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

$5 says 0bummer will veto it if passed.


15 posted on 04/16/2015 4:26:36 PM PDT by Carriage Hill ( Some days you're the windshield, and some days you're just the bug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

If you eliminate the estate tax then there is no reason for a $14k per person annual gift limitation either. No need for trust funds, estate lawyers, etc. Think of the currently locked up money that can be put to better use.


16 posted on 04/16/2015 4:28:13 PM PDT by HonorInPa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThethoughtsofGreg

Good

It’s killing families...


17 posted on 04/16/2015 5:56:34 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

I’m with you...I just don’t see the Feds giving up the right to tax our money TWICE.


18 posted on 04/17/2015 5:57:55 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson