Okay, I was an 8th-grader once. How, exactly, do you con a girl into sending you naked photos? I'm not excusing the boy's behavior here, obviously. It just seems an odd word choice. I can believe these jerks pressured or guilt-tripped the girls into doing it, but con?
"The photos wound up in the hands of other boys who were older and who demanded that more be sent."
Enjoy becoming registered sex offenders, you pervs. Even in liberal la-la land, it's against the law to view naked pictures of 13 year old girls.
"The girls said if they didn’t, the boys threatened to post the photos online and 'show the world.'"
Personally, I think it would be highly appropriate for the fathers of these girls to take these boys to the woodshed and teach them the error of their ways.
Man, I am so glad I'm not a kid today. I hated public school bad enough in my era.
If you don't send me a nude photo, I'm posting that nude photo on line?
I know the feeling, for my kids if I have them it will be homeschool, or private/military academy, to many crazies in the public school these days unlike back then.
Actually you are wrong. Nude pictures of minor children are not against the law as long as they do not depict a sexual act.That is considered art not porn. It may not be right but that is the law.