To: DUMBGRUNT
When did the definition of “subsidized” change from helping to pay for food to completely paying someone’s food bill? If someone can’t eat on $4.00 per day then get a freaking job. The world doesn’t owe you a living.
2 posted on
04/11/2015 7:19:32 AM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: Opinionated Blowhard
That's really something that needs to be emphasized. A lot of people seems to feel: "I'm going to coast through life -- you should pay all my bills for me."
Who in the world thinks that's workable?
If we got rid of the minimum wage, people could work an 8 hr day and earn, what? $8? $16 $24? Plenty of money for food then.
9 posted on
04/11/2015 7:27:07 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
("Victim" -- some people eagerly take on the label because of the many advantages that come with it.)
To: Opinionated Blowhard
When did the definition of “subsidized” change from helping to pay for food to completely paying someone’s food bill?Precisely. The name of the program is "Supplemental" Nutrition Assistance Program. I wish just once someone would challenge these retards with that.
36 posted on
04/11/2015 7:51:11 AM PDT by
BfloGuy
( Even the opponents of Socialism are dominated by socialist ideas.)
To: Opinionated Blowhard
The responsible are being enslaved by the irresponsible in our society.
We’re going to reach a point one day, where the productive just walk away from their work. That day is getting closer all the time.
Liberals are way to stupid to every consider this.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson