Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Citizen Zed

Is RT like ME?

Man, I wanted to find the developers of THAT abortion and do bad things to their pets!


2 posted on 03/31/2015 11:10:35 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (A proud 3 percenter! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3270985/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

RT allowed apps to run, but not full programs. It left consumers very confused.


5 posted on 03/31/2015 11:15:04 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

No, it’s Windows NT, for Advanced RISC Machines—somewhat similar to Windows NT 3.x/4.0—there were several versions available: MIPS, AlphaAXP (one of the earliest 64-bit architectures), PowerPC.


9 posted on 03/31/2015 11:20:53 AM PDT by __rvx86 (¡SI SE PUEDE! (Cruz 2016!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

Remember Windows Bob? The cartoon like operating system. That didn’t last long either.


16 posted on 03/31/2015 11:38:00 AM PDT by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003
> Is RT like ME? Man, I wanted to find the developers of THAT abortion and do bad things to their pets!

It wasn't the pets' fault.

For that matter, it wasn't really the developers' fault -- they were told, ordered, to break ME, so that it would kill the MS-DOS-based line of Windows.

As you know, Windows was originally just an application over MS-DOS. That was Windows 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, 95, 98, 98SE, and finally ME. Meanwhile Microsoft had developed the Windows NT line, and they knew it had to eat the older line. But 98SE was popular and it would take some doing to get it out of people's hands.

So after NT-4.0, they renamed NT-5 to "Windows 2000" and made a successor to 98SE and called it "Millenium Edition". That was allegedly so that people would confuse the two and Microsoft could effect a swapperoo.

But that wasn't enough. ME was designed to be broken on arrival. It sucked because they wanted it to suck so bad that users would drop it on the floor and flock to the new NT line, Windows 2000 and soon, Windows XP (in 2001).

And they did.

So what say we leave the developers' pets out of it? :)

30 posted on 03/31/2015 4:32:48 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is...sounding pretty good about now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson