Iran and Iraq were behind 9/11. The Saudis that provided muscle in the hijackings were from the opponents of the king and most likely were chosen to deflect attention from Iran. The leader of the attack while an Egyptian, was a member of the Syrian Muslim brotherhood and had ties to Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal, who as we now know was based in Iraq at the time and shortly after when our attention turned to Iraq was found to have committed suicide by “shooting himself in the head multiple times.” Another member of Atta’s cell in Hamburg also linked to Abu Nidal was the son of a Soviet-era East German stasi informant.
Then why not bomb Iran instead of Afghanistan? Osama in Afghanistan and mullah Omar (still missing)?
I mean going after a couple of people and even the Taliban (with whom the U.S. had ‘diplomatic’ relations before 9/11), when you can dismantle an entire regime in Iran (if they were truly the culprits behind 9/11), and has had no ‘official’ relations with the U.S. gov’t, and publicly has been hostile, was silly?
There are also many Saudi ‘royals’ (inside the House of Saud, ie “a 1000 princes”) who vehemently opposed the Saudi King, his connection to the U.S., and still do, as Osama did. Why not think one of them had a direct hand in financing, organizing or being involved in 9/11?