Posted on 03/18/2015 3:36:40 PM PDT by aquapub
The left's outrageously dishonest attempt to blame others for the Democrat policy disaster known as "ISIS" is such a brazen, in-your-face attack on the facts that it simply cannot go unanswered. Here are the top ten signs that this lunatic cult of Islamic savages currently raping, torturing, and mass-murdering its way across Syria and Iraq was created directly by Democrat policies...
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
Top ten Democrat’s excuses.
10. Bush’s fault.
9. Bush’s fault.
8. Bush’s fault.
7. Bush’s fault.
and....
1. Bush’s fault.
The Covert Origins of ISIS (aka Al Qaeda in Iraq).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMjXbuj7BPI
And who created Al Qaeda? The CIA as a response to the Soviets invading Afghanistan in 1979.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda
The origins of al-Qaeda as a network inspiring terrorism around the world and training operatives can be traced to the Soviet War in Afghanistan (December 1979 – February 1989).[49] The US viewed the conflict in Afghanistan, with the Afghan Marxists and allied Soviet troops on one side and the native Afghan mujahideen, some of whom were radical Islamic militants, on the other, as a blatant case of Soviet expansionism and aggression. A CIA program called Operation Cyclone channeled funds through Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency to the Afghan Mujahideen who were fighting the Soviet occupation.[110]
Democrats, 0bama, Hillary and McCain, are responsible for the rise of ISIS.
The Benghazi cover-up...was a gun running operation into the rebel factions of Syria. Gee....isn’t that where ISIS got its start?
First we created Bin Laden...now something far worse...ISIS.
And soon Iran too will be on the wrong side of a well funded American operation.
We’re such idiots at this point.
And we ought to eat chitlins and poke salat and watermelon. Anyone seen my Colt45?
“And who created Al Qaeda? The CIA as a response to the Soviets invading Afghanistan in 1979.”
No, the CIA funded the Afghans through Pakistan, that is true. Al Qaeda were not Afghans though, and they didn’t receive money or assistance from the CIA. Al Qaeda grew out of a community of foreign fighters that flocked to the fight, and Bin Laden was able to assume prominence with them in part because they needed his money, since the US was only funding the Afghan rebels and not the foreign fighters.
Arab Spring, change, hope... all that is ISIS
AQ was saud. America was funding other militias, but AQ was all Saud.
As for the Taleban, they were anyone that switched sides, and many of them were actual Soviet/Russia tied.
Armed by the CIA and funded by the house of Saud.
No, that is not true.
Then who supplied the AQs with those Stinger missiles that were used against the Soviets?
“Then who supplied the AQs with those Stinger missiles that were used against the Soviets?”
Sigh... there were multiple groups involved in fighting the Soviets. They were not all collectively “the AQs”.
We provided the Afghans with stingers. Those were native Afghans fighters, groups that later morphed into local warlords like the Northern Alliance. The group that eventually morphed into Al Qaeda were not Afghans. They were foreigners with “jihad fever”, just like the ones who later flocked to Bosnia, or nowadays to Syria. The CIA did not work with the foreigners, or fund them, or provide them with weapons.
That is a common misconception fueled by leftist propagandists like Michael Moore.
It was pretty common knowledge back in the ‘80s that it was the CIA supplying the Stinger missiles.
Yes, to the AFGHANS. The people that Bin Laden was with were NOT AFGHANS. Two different groups of people entirely.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.