Replies

I'm really tired of the overuse of the word “unarmed. “ I guess the White House propaganda ministry has decreed to the media outlets that they must use that word as often as possible, particularly in headlines. People see the word “unarmed” in the headlines and assume the perpetrator was just standing around minding his own business when a police officer just walked up to him and shot him. They don't bother to read all the details to find out just what the prep did that got him shot.

It's a deliberate tactic to create this false narrative to justify whatever retaliation the anarchists and rent-a-mob sent to the locations of these incidents can come up with. It's part of a plan to decimate local police forces in order to create a national police force under the complete control of the Obama White House. When that police force is created, the law will be whatever the tin pot dictator says it is. And you know the full extent of the “law” will be applied to white Christians and Jews. Blacks, illegals, gays and all the other special privileged classes will be exempt.

When it comes down to it “Unarmed” wouldn’t make any difference to the perpetual outrage crowd. Its outrage for the sake of outrage.

Last summer a cop in Ann Arbor Michigan shot and killed black woman who was in the process of attacking him with a knife. She took a hit from a taser and kept on coming so he put her down. Then the dumb SOB who called police in the first place after the woman stabbed him, turned on the police and was out there protesting against the cop.

It turned out that the same cop had pulled his gun about a month before because a black man had been coming at him with a sword. The perp in that case surrendered at the last second and lived. Naturally the left now treats it as evidence the cop is out hunting black people.