Completely anecdotal: My maternal grandmother and a maternal aunt both had multiple miscarriages. They both died at young ages from breast cancer. There could be genetics here, I don’t know because I refuse to get tested for the gene, but my mom and her other two sisters have no problems yet. They’ve outlived their mom and sister.
Interesting, and makes sense. A woman’s body basically rejects the baby in the process of a miscarriage, meaning the hormone cascade wasn’t working as it should in the first place, whereas that’s not the case with abortion. With abortion the hormone cascade is violently interrupted, and the changes that had begun in breast tissues suddenly had no natural continuation via those hormones.
The problem, of course, is the separation in time between the abortion and the breast cancer. I doubt that women in abortion-friendly countries are even asked that question, whether they’d ever had an abortion, when they present with breast cancer.
And this makes sense from a Divine judgment perspective too. It stands to reason there would be temporal consequences for the murder of the most innocent of human beings, and abortion is so barbaric that if those same things were done to a dog, somebody would go to jail. Just as there are eternal consequences for unrepentant murder:
Rev 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
Anti-Science?
This is the REAL Inconvenient Truth.