Here is a thought project for liberals.
According to homosexuals, they are hard wired to be homosexuals. It is who they are, its in their DNA according to them. They cannot change.
But you can be whatever gender you want even if it is different than your DNA. You can change it whenever you want.
Do these two arguments contradict each other?
Good point!
But you can be whatever gender you want even if it is different than your DNA. You can change it whenever you want.
Do these two arguments contradict each other?
I'd suppose that the second argument would be closer to this: this transgendered person's DNA or other "hardwiring" (not all arguments are DNA-related) would align less with what we might call one's chromosomal gender (or whatever the term would be) than with one's gender identity (or whatever the term would be).
Sex positive advocates don’t CARE about the ‘why’. The “born that way” meme is just to roll over the opposition, “well, if they can’t help themselves....”
The sex positive agenda seeks to end ALL moral judgment over sexual pairings of any kind regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s). They seek to see everyone sexually active at every age (orgasm is a birthright to be experienced and shared by everyone).
They see abstinence as ‘unhealthy’ because they see it as (counter to their worldview and) a suppression of sexual desires.
Do it with your neighbor’s wife. Do it with your cousin. Do it with your dog. “It’s nobody’s business but your own”