No, "The Most Credibility Challenged Myth Ever Told"
See tag line
And we dredged up an article championing Darwinian codswollop from 2008 today for what reason again, Jimbo?
FReegards!
No, "The Most Credibility Challenged Myth Ever Told"
See tag line
And we dredged up an article championing Darwinian codswollop from 2008 today for what reason again, Jimbo?
FReegards!
A lot of postings today were bashing and misrepresenting the theory of evolution as it is generally understood and practiced today. Darwin got the ball rolling but if he hadn’t, Wallace and others were waiting in the wings. All this was the result of naturalism, seeking natural explanations for natural observations. Today, Darwin is a historical figure who came up with a useful idea. There are observations and applications which have long ago left Darwin in the dust.