Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: purcre

But you just said “Did the same thing as..in 1898”
So the image was ALREADY known?

But hey, it’s all a CONSPIRACY, right?


87 posted on 02/12/2015 8:15:56 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Darksheare; purcre

What he’s saying is that the same technique used in 1898 to show more detail of the Shroud of Turin has “allegedly” been applied to Veronica’s Veil and this “negative image” shows some more detail that proves both shroud’s authenticity.

But (cue breathless gasp) “the Vatican” is suppressing this new evidence for “financial reasons”.

The question remains: What POSSIBLE motivation would “the Vatican” have for doing this, when, if what is being claimed is true, it would make both shrouds even bigger money-makers than they are now! In other words the site he links to claims the motivation is money but again, that makes no sense. None whatsoever.

It’s a shame there’s a new undead thread now. This would be a perfect candidate. Is it possible to have two going at once or does that break some laws of Physics or something?


89 posted on 02/12/2015 8:26:25 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson