Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Talisker; boop
16 is not 12 - there are far more than four years difference in maturity at those ages than perhaps any other.

I think it fair to say that a 12 year old may not have the mental framework to have much empathy for the portent of that novel. Even so, as she matures, those concepts from the novel will lead to an "understanding".

I read 1984. I know that I didn't understand it then, like I do now.

Truly, though, whether she did or didn't have the 'ability' or 'experience' to comprehend the political aspects of the novel is not really that critical to the premise of the article.

13 posted on 02/01/2015 9:31:07 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
Truly, though, whether she did or didn't have the 'ability' or 'experience' to comprehend the political aspects of the novel is not really that critical to the premise of the article.

Funny, it seemed to me like the premise of the article was to justify the answer he gave to his daughter. In any event, I was simply commenting on what I believe to be her immaturity to properly comprehend the book at her age. I have no doubt she could write a book report and get an "A," but that's not what I'm talking about. My point was the very effect it had on her that so horrified her father. To me, her age made that effect inevitable.

14 posted on 02/01/2015 9:48:54 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson