Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford

At the current birth, death and ‘immigration’ rates there won’t be enough people speaking German in 200 years to sustain the language.

Your neighbors need to wake up - and quickly...


10 posted on 01/27/2015 3:23:26 PM PST by GOPJ (Radical Muslims are the brutish "Morlocks' of the Islamic coin - flip of peace loving Eloi...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: GOPJ
Germany as a nation has concluded that its destiny lies not within its national borders (which have historically hopscotched around the map) but in a multinational organization called the European Union. Just because a nation has come to this conclusion doesn't mean necessarily that is a vision shared by the people. Many people in Germany have simply stuck their head in the sand, defeated by a barrage of guilt for Germany's role in the Holocaust. Any manifestation of national spirit directed toward anything other than the soccer team is verboten.

If political correctness forbids the open support of the nation as a nation state and permits only support of human values generally crystallized in organizations like the European Union, the United Nations, the world court, the European Court of human rights etc., the nationstate is going to wither.

The Germans also concluded individually that their personal destiny does not lie in extended families. This is a choice that comes with feminism and with the pill. As a nation Germany is willing to accept foreign workers, even Muslim foreign workers who are difficult if not impossible to assimilate, in order to keep the economic engine going. Japan, in many ways similar to Germany, has embarked in the opposite direction. I happen to think in the long run Japan is right. The quality of life of the nation, often expressed as the economic vitality of the nation, will in the future not be dependent on the number of people but on the productive power of the nation created by technology. It is not how many people on welfare a nation has but how many robots it has producing wealth.

The question is, how do you distribute that wealth produced by machines rather than people without succumbing to socialist solutions of redistribution?


11 posted on 01/28/2015 2:47:59 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson