mote mischief~
So, mankind is responsible for warming temperatures.
Apparently the problem isn’t CO2 it’s mercury! /s
I don’t understand why they need thermometers on the ground. We’ve got literally billions of dollars worth remote-sensing satellites in orbit that can make these measurements.
Ping.
I have known about this since reading "State of Fear" by Michael Crichton and being inspired to do a little research. Turns out there are numerous "adjustments" made to the data to account for things like changes in land use, population, precision and accuracy of the gear, etc... Well, turns out these "adjustments" and factors are an order of magnitude (or two) larger than the trends "discovered" in the data. Yeah, that's right, those scary sounding, alarmist trends in the data saying we're all doomed are almost certainly a figment of mathematical manipulation and imagination.
After reading that, doing a little research on what passes for "climate science" and knowing what I know about large scale computer modeling of complex systems... I've reached the considered opinion that climate science, global warming, anthropomorphic global warming, rapid climate change, climate change, or whatever they're calling it now is a load of BS. It is a load of BS promoted and advocated by a bunch of people my dad would call the "north end of a southbound horse."
If at first your climate model fails, Adjust!, Adjust!, Adjust!
Adjustment is the climate model scientist’s best friend.
And, at the rate of their present predictive record, arguably their only friend.
OK!! Everybody pay attention!
Lesson for today:
1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.
2. The sun is a ball of fire that controls the climates of all its planets.
3. The earth is one of the suns planets.
4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.
5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.
Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?
The computer model is the final authority. Factual that does not coincide with the model is necessarily wrong.
And GlowBull Warming killed off the Mayans and Aztec empires:
for the record I don’t think that was the only cause.
They were likely ravaged by disease, famine and a drought.
There has never been a catastrophic point of civilization change, over one factor or event.
Certainly, the Aztecs located near quite a few rivers that were feed from hundreds and thousand of miles away and they at least had some agrarian skills, as well, were able to master irrigation.
http://www.history.com/topics/aztecs/videos/aztec-aqueducts
So who knows what the heck happened.
They should have at least left a note telling us where they were going or when they would be back...
Liberal rule:
If the facts don’t fir the liberals’ narrow little ideology, then the facts are wrong.
Pope's visit to stoke climate fight
Obama Targets Americans At The Pump
Global Warming on Free Republic